148 17 258 2 1220 document 258 Stupple et al PLoS One Dataset.xlsx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet a915850df0d3b33253e721864e4fcbf4 MD5 41743 2017-10-12 21:56:38 https://data.lancashire.ac.uk/id/eprint/148/1/Stupple%20et%20al%20PLoS%20One%20Dataset.xlsx 148 1 1 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet application/vnd.ms-excel Full dataset with clear variable labels en public cc_by_4

Stupple et al PLoS One Dataset.xlsx

data 259 2 1223 document 259 Stupple et al PLoS One Dataset.sav application/octet-stream 346b8e313711a9b387ee9cdbfbad9e2c MD5 33728 2017-10-12 22:05:03 https://data.lancashire.ac.uk/id/eprint/148/2/Stupple%20et%20al%20PLoS%20One%20Dataset.sav 148 2 2 application/octet-stream other SPSS version of dataset en public cc_by_4

Stupple et al PLoS One Dataset.sav

data archive 5163 disk0/00/00/01/48 2017-11-14 10:38:53 2023-07-24 13:40:44 2017-11-14 10:38:53 data_collection show Stupple Edward E.J.N.Stupple@derby.ac.uk http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8545-9504 Pitchford Melanie Melanie.Pitchford@beds.ac.uk http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4898-6628 Ball Linden LBall@uclan.ac.uk http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5099-0124 Hunt Thomas T.Hunt@derby.ac.uk http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5769-1154 Steel Richard R.Steel@lboro.ac.uk C855 C856 2023sub_P Cognitive Reflection Test; response times; cognitive miserliness; heuristic-analytic processing; dual-process theories Abstract for the published article as follows: We report a study examining the role of ‘cognitive miserliness’ as a determinant of poor performance on the standard three-item Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT). The cognitive miserliness hypothesis proposes that people often respond incorrectly on CRT items because of an unwillingness to go beyond default, heuristic processing and invest time and effort in analytic, reflective processing. Our analysis (N = 391) focused on people’s response times to CRT items to determine whether predicted associations are evident between miserly thinking and the generation of incorrect, intuitive answers. Evidence indicated only a weak correlation between CRT response times and accuracy. Item-level analyses also failed to demonstrate predicted response-time differences between correct analytic and incorrect intuitive answers for two of the three CRT items. We question whether participants who give incorrect intuitive answers on the CRT can legitimately be termed cognitive misers and whether the three CRT items measure the same general construct. 10.17030/uclan.data.00000148 dataset RG_027 rdmsupport@uclan.ac.uk Co-Author Ball Linden LBall@uclan.ac.uk The three items of the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) were presented to all participants via Apple Macintosh computers (Lancaster University) and PC machines (University of Derby). CRT items were presented one at a time in a randomized order. Responses for each item were recorded after participants had entered an answer in an on-screen field and had then clicked on a button to move to the next screen. Response times for each item reflected the total duration from its initial presentation to the submission of a response. Participants were excluded if they were familiar with the task and were replaced. Ethical clearance was granted through the local ethics committees at the respective institutions where the study was conducted. On completion of all of the items participants were thanked for taking part in the experiment and were given a printed debrief sheet. Any questions arising from the experiment or the debrief sheet were answered prior to participants departing the experiment. 2007 2012